WebPringle (2003) The Court reasoned that "a reasonable officer could conclude that there was probable cause to believe that Pringle committed the crime of possession of cocaine." … WebMARYLAND v. PRINGLE 540 U.S. 366 (2003) possibility of parole. The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland affirmed. . . . The Court of Appeals of Maryland, by divided vote, reversed, holding that, absent specific facts tending to show Pringle’s knowledge and dominion or control

02-809 - Maryland v. Pringle (11/3/03) - Supreme Court of the …

Web627 Words3 Pages. Case Citation: Maryland v Pringle, 540 U.S. (Washington, D.C. 2003). Parties: Maryland, Petitioner / Appellants Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / … WebMaryland v. Pringle. Facts: Respondent, Pringle, was pulled over for speeding. The officer searched his car and found money and cocaine. He then proceeded to arrest Respondent and the car's two other occupants. Respondent was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and possession of cocaine, and was sentenced to 10 years' … cosafa womens 2022

Case Brief on Maryland versus Pringle - 1685 Words Essay Example

WebMaryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the extent of discretion given to police officers acting in good faith. The Court held that where police reasonably believe their warrant was valid during a search, execution of the warrant does not violate … WebMaryland v. Pringle (2003) In determining probable cause, the term "man of reasonable caution," which is best interpreted using the standard of an "objectively reasonable police … WebPringle appealed a conviction, based on lack of probable cause, when he was arrested for paraphernalia found in the back of another person’s a car, while sitting in the front. … cosain onóir tré gach easonóir a dhíoghail