site stats

Lamar archer & cofrin llp v. appling

Webb5 juni 2024 · The debtor in this case (Appling) had accrued some law firm debt. At some point before getting more services, he told the law firm (Lamar, Archer & Cofrin) he’d be able to repay. He said he expected a tax refund of around $100,000, so no problem. Turns out, his tax refund wasn’t near that. WebbOn June 4, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling in which the Court unanimously answered this question in the affirmative. The facts of the case are relatively straightforward. The law firm of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (the “Firm”) represented R. Scott Appling (“Appling”) in business ...

A Single Statement about a Debtor’s Financial Condition Must be …

Webb14 juni 2024 · On June 4, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling , No. 16-1215, which dealt with the dischargeability of debt in bankruptcy proceedings. The Court held that a statement about a single asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition” under section 523(a)(2) of … Webbof Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling (In re Appling), the United States Supreme Court addressed the dischargeability of certain debts owed by a dishonest debtor in bankruptcy. The case arose from a debt of $60,000 in legal fees owed to the Lamar law firm by a client, Mr. Appling, in connection with a business litigation matter. o2センサー 故障 症状 バイク https://tycorp.net

The Supreme Court Extends Bankruptcy Protections To Even …

WebbParties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case APPLING v. LAMAR, ARCHER & COFRIN, LLP, case number 3:15-cv-00031, from Georgia Middle Court. Webb27 jan. 2024 · Appling was able to convince the law firm to continue representing him without bringing an action against him for the recovery of the debt by orally representing that he expected a tax refund of $100,000 and that he would use the refund to pay off his outstanding legal bills. [37] WebbQUESTION PRESENTED: The Bankruptcy Code prohibits the discharge of "any debt ... for money, property, [or] services ... to the extent obtained by ... false p... agropetrolera chajari

APPLING v. LAMAR, ARCHER & COFRIN, LLP - leagle.com

Category:Debtor’s Statement About a Single Asset Must be in Writing to …

Tags:Lamar archer & cofrin llp v. appling

Lamar archer & cofrin llp v. appling

LAMAR ARCHER COFRIN LLP v. APPLING (2024) FindLaw

Webb4 juni 2024 · On June 4, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v.Appling, No. 16-1215, holding that a statement about a single asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition” under section 523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. R. Scott Appling fell behind on legal fees that he … WebbLamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP, Petitioner v. R. Scott Appling: Docketed: April 11, 2024: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: Case Numbers: (16-11911) Decision Date: February 15, 2024: Rehearing Denied: Discretionary Court Decision Date: Questions Presented

Lamar archer & cofrin llp v. appling

Did you know?

Webb17 apr. 2024 · Appling assuaged the law firm’s concerns by saying that he expected a $100,000 tax return that would cover the fees he owed Lamar. In June 2024, Appling applied for a refund of only $60,000. In October, he received the $60,000 refund but did not pay any of his debt to Lamar. WebbAppling v. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (In re Appling) Summarized by David Bury, Stone & Baxter, LLP 6 years 1 month ago; Eleventh Circuit takes sides with the majority in circuit split over Section 523(a)(2). - Rochelle Quick Take. View Rochelle Summary. Case Type: Consumer Case Status:

Webb15 feb. 2024 · Read Appling v. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (In re Appling), 848 F.3d 953, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database Webb{"ID":62943,"name":"Lamar, Archer \u0026 Cofrin, LLP v. Appling","href":"https:\/\/api.oyez.org\/cases\/2024\/16-1215","view_count":0,"docket_number":"16-1215 ...

Webb6 juni 2024 · In the case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP, v. Appling, 16-1215 (June 4, 2024), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a materially false statement about a single asset can be a “statement respecting ... Webb15 feb. 2024 · Debtor made false oral statements to his lawyers, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP, that he expected a large tax refund that he would use to pay his debt to the firm. ... Appling v. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP. February 15, 2024. February 15, 2024 by Justia .

Webb5 juni 2024 · By: Donald L. Swanson “a statement about a single asset can be a ‘statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition’ under §523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.” U.S. Supreme Court, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling, Case No. 16-1215, June 4, 2024. One of the frequently-mediated types of disputes in bankruptcy is …

Webb28 nov. 2024 · 2024 law review article cited in course of briefing in U.S. Supreme Court case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling, 138 S.Ct. 1752 (2024) -- A. Emerson, "So You Want to Buy a... agropetica romaniaWebbDocket activity of federal case APPLING v. LAMAR, ARCHER & COFRIN, LLP, case number 3:15-cv-00031, from Georgia Middle Court. o 2つ 単語Webb6 juli 2024 · Scott Appling hired Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP to represent him in a business lawsuit. He fell behind on his bills and the firm told him they would have to stop representing him. He asked them to keep working on his case and told them he was getting a $100,000 tax refund, which he would use to cover past and future fees. agropiave crevadaWebb23 juli 2024 · In the recent Supreme Court decision Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v.Appling, 138 S. Ct. 1752 (2024), one can almost hear Justice Sotomayor belting out the lyrics to Aretha Franklin’s classic, “all I’m askin’ is for a little RESPECT . . . .” Justice Sotomayor relies on the simple definition of “Respecting,” to settle a split in the circuits, … agropiave.itWebb4 juni 2024 · Respondent R. Scott Appling hired petitioner Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (Lamar), a law firm, to represent him in a business litigation. Appling fell behind on his legal bills, and by March 2005, he owed Lamar more than $60,000. o2センサー 電圧 高いWebbQUESTION: Can a statement regarding a specific asset be a “statement respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition” under section 523(a)(2)(B) of the Ban... o2センサー 不具合 症状Webb4 juni 2024 · Appling. In this case, a client owed money to a law firm, and the firm threatened to withdraw if its fees were not paid. The client told the firm (not in writing) … agropharma net