WebSupporters of POTA have contended that sections 52(4) and 52(14) are in line with Article 22 of the Indian Constitution, which exempts the State from providing legal counsel to a person being held for "preventive detention" and implicitly places some limitations on the confidential relationship between a lawyer and client. WebApr 28, 2024 · But again, due to widely reported misuse of POTA including the arrest of Vaiko, the MDMK leader from Tamil Nadu under POTA, the Act was eventually repealed …
Constitutionality of UAPA Amendment - Supreme Court Observer
Web2004 The Constitutional validity of POTA was challenged in People‘s Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India (2004) 9 SCC 580, wherein this Hon‘ble Court upheld the validity of the Act. ... WebMay 11, 2024 · Prior to this redesigning of UAPA, terrorist activities were primarily dealt with under the now repealed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 … park medical centre park road peterborough
U.S. Supreme Court empowers bids to curb authority of federal …
WebHowever, the majority of POTA’s provisions were re-incorporated in the 2004 Amendment Act. It was enhanced further in 2008, following the Mumbai attacks. ... The NGO’s appeal called into question the constitutionality of Sections 35 and 36 of the UAPA, which allow the government to designate someone as a terrorist. ... WebAnti-terrorism laws in India and the need of POTA In the new millennium, we face the very real and increasing prospect that regional aggressor, third-rate armies, terrorist groups … Webunamended POTA. Learning from the Past The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1985, 1987, which ex-pired in 1995, amidst widespread criti-cisms of … timing cover reseal leaking